vr6highline28 0 Posted October 25, 2005 Report Share Posted October 25, 2005 anyone seen the latest edition of the above with the articles about the new Mk5 R32 ? just wondered what the comment inferring that VW had made the same mistake with the new r32 as the mk3 vr6 meant ? its in the article towards the end mentioning R32's, V6 4motions etcd ???? any ideas for this simpleton ? !sad Link to post Share on other sites
binliner 0 Posted October 25, 2005 Report Share Posted October 25, 2005 haven read it Link to post Share on other sites
matth76 1 Posted October 25, 2005 Report Share Posted October 25, 2005 I haven't read it but I do know the only thing clearly wrong with the mk3 VR6 is the soggy handling which is not what it should be on a car with near on 200bhp (don't know what's wrong with the new r32 - all the mags I have read about it says it is excellent in all areas - it is more subtle than the mk5 gti though but built to be like that). Link to post Share on other sites
Eat this 2 Posted October 26, 2005 Report Share Posted October 26, 2005 cant comment on the soggy handling as iv never driven 1 with standard suspension but the gearbox aint the best imho Link to post Share on other sites
sefton 0 Posted October 26, 2005 Report Share Posted October 26, 2005 could of squeesed a little more power out of the huge v6 lump imo! Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts